<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google chrome: a first impressions review.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trickeries.com/217/google-chrome-a-first-impressions-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trickeries.com/217/google-chrome-a-first-impressions-review/</link>
	<description>it's tricky to rock a style thats liked online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:31:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: atom</title>
		<link>http://trickeries.com/217/google-chrome-a-first-impressions-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2631</link>
		<dc:creator>atom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trickeries.com/?p=217#comment-2631</guid>
		<description>@Timothy

What I &lt;em&gt;love&lt;/em&gt; is Firebug.  Let me know when you have it topped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Timothy</p>
<p>What I <em>love</em> is Firebug.  Let me know when you have it topped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Hatcher</title>
		<link>http://trickeries.com/217/google-chrome-a-first-impressions-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2626</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Hatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 05:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trickeries.com/?p=217#comment-2626</guid>
		<description>If you like Chrome&#039;s stripped down Web Inspector, you will love the original, full featured version in the WebKit nightlies. (Including double clicking to edit CSS/DOM.) Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you like Chrome&#8217;s stripped down Web Inspector, you will love the original, full featured version in the WebKit nightlies. (Including double clicking to edit CSS/DOM.) Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: savageaphid</title>
		<link>http://trickeries.com/217/google-chrome-a-first-impressions-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2590</link>
		<dc:creator>savageaphid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trickeries.com/?p=217#comment-2590</guid>
		<description>I had a good time with Chrome. It was quick and clean. I expect this app to move to the top handful of applications running on a regular basis pretty quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a good time with Chrome. It was quick and clean. I expect this app to move to the top handful of applications running on a regular basis pretty quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: williac</title>
		<link>http://trickeries.com/217/google-chrome-a-first-impressions-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2571</link>
		<dc:creator>williac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 05:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trickeries.com/?p=217#comment-2571</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;m in love already.

No major hitches so far. The learning curve is practically nonexistent. It even has spellcheck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;m in love already.</p>
<p>No major hitches so far. The learning curve is practically nonexistent. It even has spellcheck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nocash</title>
		<link>http://trickeries.com/217/google-chrome-a-first-impressions-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2569</link>
		<dc:creator>nocash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 05:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trickeries.com/?p=217#comment-2569</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve more-or-less come to the same conclusion:  Chrome for standard browsing, FF for development.  That&#039;s what I&#039;m going to try for, anyway.  Chrome&#039;s lack of addons may push be back to FF in the short-term, but I&#039;m coming up with alternatives to the ones that I&#039;m most used to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve more-or-less come to the same conclusion:  Chrome for standard browsing, FF for development.  That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m going to try for, anyway.  Chrome&#8217;s lack of addons may push be back to FF in the short-term, but I&#8217;m coming up with alternatives to the ones that I&#8217;m most used to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
